WASHINGTON — Microsoft founder Bill Gates has broken ranks with the technology industry in its support for Apple’s refusal to make software to unlock a phone used in the San Bernardino shooting.
Mr Gates told the Financial Times that technology companies should be forced to co-operate with law enforcement in terrorism investigations.
Apple on Monday urged the creation of a government panel on encryption, the latest salvo in its standoff over a locked iPhone that has escalated into a public relations battle between the revered technology company and the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
Apple CEO Tim Cook also sent a letter to employees on Monday morning, making clear that the company’s hardline stance in refusing to make software to unlock the phone addresses broader issues, not just a single device linked to a grisly attack.
"This case is about much more than a single phone or a single investigation," Mr Cook said in the e-mail to employees, seen by Reuters. "At stake is the data security of hundreds of millions of law-abiding people, and setting a dangerous precedent that threatens everyone’s civil liberties."
FBI director James Comey, in an article published late on Sunday on the national security legal blog Lawfare, asserted the case was not about setting a new legal precedent but rather about "victims and justice".
"Fourteen people were slaughtered and many more had their lives and bodies ruined," Mr Comey wrote. "We owe them a thorough and professional investigation under law. That’s what this is."
A federal judge last week ordered Apple to create new software and take others steps to retrieve data from the locked phone, used by Syed Rizwan Farook, one of the San Bernardino shooters, who was killed in a gun battle with police.
Mr Gates said: "This is a specific case where the government is asking for access to information. They are not asking for some general thing, they are asking for a particular case."
His decision sets him apart from other Silicon Valley top executives, such as Facebook chief Mark Zuckerberg, Twitter founder Jack Dorsey and Google head Sundar Pichai, who have all backed Mr Cook’s decision, the newspaper added.
The company is fighting the order, arguing that creating such a key will jeopardise the security of all iPhones. The company’s formal legal arguments are expected on Friday.
The justice department’s manoeuvres over the past week have prompted Apple supporters to suggest the case is as much about putting political pressure on Apple and influencing the broader policy debate on encryption as it is about getting data from Farook’s phone.
The justice department launched its unusually public campaign to force Apple’s hand by publicising the court order itself, which normally would have been under seal, according to legal experts.
Then, on Friday, the justice department filed additional court papers that repeated its legal arguments and criticised the company’s resistance as a "brand marketing strategy".
The government acknowledged that the Friday filing was "not legally necessary".
Apple responded hours later by holding a conference call with reporters — a rare move by a generally reticent company that is accustomed to making news rather than reacting to it.
That was followed early on Monday by a public blog post and an internal e-mail to employees arguing the company’s case.
Meanwhile, the government has actively solicited victims of the shooting to join its case against Apple.
Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik, destroyed their personal phones before carrying out the December 2 shooting rampage in San Bernardino, California, which killed 14 and wounded 22.
Authorities believe the couple was inspired by the Islamic State. The phone at issue is an iPhone 5c issued to Farook by San Bernardino County in his role as a health inspector.
Digital security commission
The case has revived interest on Capitol Hill in pursuing legislation to address the problem of what law enforcement officials call "going dark" — where tight digital security prevents them from accessing the data of criminal suspects.
The idea of setting up a commission — which may be a prelude to a broader legislative solution — is not new, although a political resolution of the data privacy and encryption debate has proven elusive for many years.
A digital security commission comprising technology, business and law enforcement experts has been proposed by Democratic senator Mark Warner and Republican representative Michael McCaul, who chairs the homeland security committee, to help break the impasse over encryption.
The bipartisan pair is scheduled to unveil details of legislation that would create a panel at a Washington event on Wednesday.
Apple indicated it would work with a commission or panel of experts to discuss the matter further.
"Apple would gladly participate in such an effort," the company wrote in the Monday post on its website addressing questions about the case.
The company could not be immediately reached for further comment.
The justice department has pushed back on framing the dispute as an encryption issue, insisting that it is only trying to get past the lock screen on one phone. Apple has argued that while it is technically possible to bypass the security features of the iPhone by building a new operating system, such a move would set a dangerous precedent.
Bipartisan leaders of the US House energy and commerce committee late on Friday invited Mr Cook and Mr Comey to testify at an upcoming hearing on encryption, although no date was set.
Senators Richard Burr and Dianne Feinstein, the top Republican and Democrat of the Senate intelligence committee respectively, have long said they intend to introduce legislation that would force a company to be able to grant authorities access to a suspect’s data, although a bill has not yet materialised.
Some victims of the attack will file a legal brief in support of the US government’s attempt to force open to unlock the phone, a lawyer representing the victims told Reuters on Sunday.