KOFI ANNAN: Novel way to choose linchpin of global court
IN DECEMBER, a little-reported process will conclude when the 119 states that are parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) elect a new prosecutor.
There are many important decisions facing the world's diplomats. The process must result in the appointment of the most qualified candidate, and not, as is too often the case, the person thought least offensive to most countries.
The ICC prosecutor and the office he presides over carry a heavy responsibility - to bring to international justice the perpetrators of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.
Some political leaders, including those who risk prosecution, openly and maliciously challenge the impartiality of the prosecutor; others refuse to abide by their obligations under the Rome Statute to co- operate fully with the prosecutor so that investigations, indictments and trials can proceed. And many powerful states, including China, Russia and the US, have still not joined the court.
Clearly, the prosecutor has a tough job. He must stand with the victims and pursue justice, but do so in a way that demonstrates to all fair-minded people that the law is being applied equally without bias or favour. This is no easy task in a world in which trust is in short supply. He must rely on governments to make justice real - there is no international police force. Legal knowledge is key, as is a devotion to justice and the ability to lead an international team. Above all, the prosecutor must have the skill to build, pursue and win cases, while deftly maintaining the confidence of victims and governments.
The Rome Statute recognises that this is a unique international post. The prosecutor serves for up to nine years and cannot be re-elected - thus strengthening the independence of the post. Moreover, unlike many senior international posts, there are very specific and clear rules in place to prevent the arbitrary removal of the prosecutor. The Rome Statute also makes clear that appointment should be solely on the basis of merit and experience, and that whoever is chosen must be a person of "high moral character".
The 119 states that have joined the statute are obliged, therefore, to avoid the temptation of treating this appointment as they do other international jobs. Too often, candidates for senior posts at international organisations conduct elaborate election campaigns in conjunction with their governments. This approach brings a lot of problems: first, people who are not supported by their own governments, no matter how qualified, have no hope of becoming an official candidate, much less getting elected. It also leads to vote-trading in a type of global bazaar: one country promises support for another country's candidature in exchange for the latter's support for one of its own candidatures for a different post. Merit often becomes a secondary consideration.
This must not happen in the election of the ICC prosecutor. There must be no hint of politicking in the election of the person who will exercise the important functions assigned to this post.
To their credit, the parties to the Rome Statute are trying something new. A search committee with five members has been constituted to search for possible successors to the current prosecutor. It has drawn up a list of candidates, all of whom will be interviewed, and then it will provide the states with a final short list of three names. The final decision rests with states. Member states may still nominate separate candidates, but so far none of them has done so, thereby respecting the committee process.
This process is highly unusual in the international sphere and deserves the full support of all those interested in the success of the ICC. It holds out real hope of producing a consensus candidate who is chosen because he is best equipped to do the job. And it is this above all else that must guide the final decision.
When, as United Nations (UN) secretary-general, I opened the conference in Rome in 1998 where the ICC Statute was being drafted, I urged delegates " not (to) flinch from creating a court strong and independent enough to carry out its task. It must be an instrument of justice, not expediency. It must be able to protect the weak against the strong." This was accomplished in Rome. The ICC Statute is a remarkable achievement.
But politicising the election of the prosecutor, or polluting it with the horse- trading and vote-swapping that characterise too many elections for international and UN posts, would risk undoing this important achievement.
. Annan was UN secretary-general from 1997 to 2006.
More in this section
- Disillusioned SA will learn to walk like Egyptians
- Chaskalson transcended his bias and loyalties
- EDITORIAL: The problem with ANC branches
- People were central to Chaskalson’s endeavours
- THICK END OF THE WEDGE: Zuma’s Get Out of Jail Free card
- NEWS ANALYSIS: ANC’s winner in Mangaung may still lack legitimacy
- Licensing bill to be redrafted after avalanche of disapproval
- Saxonwold ANC ‘to act against Atul Gupta’
- Gupta brothers are merely a symptom, not the problem
- Burger King fires up its grill in Cape Town
- Health insurance plan, price regulation soon, says minister
- Courts reel in SARS ‘fishing expeditions’ against taxpayers